“In any event, whether we think our ordinary, pre-scientific perceptual and rational faculties are unreliable to only a minor extent or to a significant extent, we cannot coherently regard them as fundamentally unreliable. And that they are fundamentally reliable is all the EAAN requires. Even science at its most rarefied presupposes that at some level our senses tell us the truth in a systematic way, and that basic arithmetic, modus ponens, conjunctive reasoning, etc. are valid modes of inference. EAAN claims that naturalism is inconsistent with this presupposition, and nothing Schliesser has said shows otherwise.”
↧
Feser on Schliesser’s Comments on Plantinga’s EAAN by way of Nagel, &c.
↧